Plasmidgate: Making a Mockery of International Human Rights Law & Medical Ethics
Plasmidgate: Making a Mockery of International Human Rights Law & Medical Ethics
In this video presentation, Willem van Aardt, PhD uncovers a disconcerting parallel between what occurred in Nazi Germany and during the Covid-19 crisis.
The World Council for Health hosted an emergency panel on 27 November 2023 featuring Willem van Aardt, PhD and seven other leading experts to address the legal implications of DNA contamination in Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. This is Willem’s presentation. Visit worldcouncilforhealth.org/justice to watch the full hearing and to sign up for updates about Plasmidgate as more information becomes available. Thank you.
You can also find this video on Rumble, Facebook, Bitchute & Spotify.
Willem van Aardt’s presentation provided an International Human Rights Law (IHRL) perspective, focusing on the informed consent criterion and the egregious violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Willem is author of the book COVID-19 LAWLESSNESS and numerous peer-reviewed legal articles relating to the violation of fundamental human rights during the COVID-19 crisis.
International Human Rights Law & the Voluntary Consent Criterion
On the back of countless assurances by manufacturers, public health agencies, and the World Health Organization (WHO) that the Covid ‘vaccines’ were ‘extremely safe’ and ‘highly effective’, citizens were required to sign informed consent declarations before getting their shots. From the outset many people were concerned about the contents of the mRNA injections, which had not been made public. Since then, the discovery of plasmid DNA contamination has confirmed that these shots should never have been described as safe.
IHRL sees individuals as the main subjects of international law. A fundamental principle of international law is the jus cogens or peremptory norm; this is accepted by the international community as a norm from which no derogation is permitted. Thus, a State Party cannot ignore the obligations imposed by a jus cogens norm, which also limits the ability of the State to craft contradictory legislation.
Medical Experimentation Without Informed Consent
Article 7 of the ICCPR explicitly determines that “no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation,” such as the experimental Covid-19 ‘vaccine’. No derogation may be made from this Article, even in times of a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation. Medical experimentation without free and informed consent is viewed in a class similar to the prohibition of slavery and torture from which no derogation is allowed. Covid-19 vaccine mandates significantly infringed on the individual’s right to medical self-determination in violation of Article 7 of the ICCPR and IHRL jus cogens norms.
Related content on WCH Substack:
The following agreements, which set norms and standards for bioethics, explicitly reference the voluntary consent criterion:
The Nuremberg Code 1946
The World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki 1948
The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights 2005
The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Managing Ethical Issues in Infectious Disease Outbreaks 2016.
Three essential requirements are needed to meet the voluntary consent criterion. In each case, an example is given of how these were not fulfilled:
freedom from coercion and pressure, e.g. ‘no jab, no job’
informed and educated consent, including the absence of false and misleading information, e.g. the ‘safe and effective’ falsehood
a healthy psychological state, e.g. not the mass delusion created by the Covid narrative.
With reference to the third criterion, the term ‘menticide’ has been used to describe the mass delusion of a nation subjected to large-scale government propaganda designed to influence emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and behaviour. There are clear similarities between what occurred in Nazi Germany and the Covid phenomenon. In this case, the transnational pharmaceutical industry, governments, public health authorities, and other political and financial profiteers manipulated the public into getting injected with an experimental Covid-19 injection.
To contend that citizens were able to give ‘informed consent’ to the experimental Covid-19 vaccines (while at the same time not disclosing known plasmid DNA contamination and potential harmful side effects) is preposterous and makes a mockery of medical ethics and the law.
There needs to be a substantive judicial reckoning at both national and international levels with all public and private officials who violated International Human Rights Law.
This article was written by World Council for Health Correspondent Alice Ashwell, PhD.
About Willem van Aardt, PhD
Willem van Aardt is an Extraordinary Research Fellow specializing in International Human Rights and Constitutional Law, and the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Finbond Group Limited.
He obtained B.Proc. (Cum Laude) and LL. M. degrees from the University of Pretoria (South Africa) in 1994 and 1996 and finalized his Doctor Legum degree in Public Law through the North-West University (South Africa) in 2005. The central focus his doctoral research was “State responsibility for human rights abuses committed by non-state actors under the Constitution.”
After completing his legal articles and being admitted as an Attorney of the High Court of South Africa in 1996, he co-founded Thuthukani Group in 1998, founded Finbond Group in 2003 and was admitted as a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales in 2005.
Over the past 20 years, Finbond has grown from a small one-office Pretoria, South Africa-based company to a global financial services group with more than 590 store locations in South Africa, Canada, and the United States of America-Finbond focus mainly, but not exclusively, on providing unsecured loans to the previously disadvantaged and marginalized. In 2017 Willem relocated from South Africa to the United States of America.
In 2020 he was appointed as an Extraordinary Research Fellow at North-West University, Research Unit: Law, Justice, and Sustainability. Willem is author of the book COVID-19 LAWLESSNESS and numerous peer-reviewed legal articles relating to the violation of fundamental human rights during the COVID-19 crisis. Six of his articles have been published in The Law Society of South Africa’s esteemed legal journal, De Rebus (www.derebus.org) during 2020, 2021, and 2022.
Over the past three years, Willem van Aardt’s legal articles have been downloaded and read by thousands of researchers in more than 120 countries globally on academia.edu.
If you find value in this Substack and have the means, please consider making a contribution to support the World Council for Health. Thank you.
Plasmids, like spike protein concerns are a distraction.
The PLATFORM is toxic already. The lipids cause most of the issues.
https://amothersanthem.substack.com/p/kariko-and-wiseman-study-2015-they
Do not comply with your executioners.