I think one good look at what the WHO is currently steamrollering through can confirm we are rapidly approaching the "We have ZERO Human Rights left at all" point.
Yet, the WHO is undeniably an unelected, private stakeholder corporation. They in no way represent the people of any nation. No matter what they say to the contrary.
So if someone can explain to me precisly *why* they wield the power they do unchallenged, or exactly why the people of each nation have not, with a very few exceptions, told them to go to hell already, I'd greatly appreciate it.
While I very much appreciate all the legal points made in this article, I would like to see another perspective being considered/discussed. While people may or may not be 'legally' correct, I always wonder what their motivation is for why they do what they do, and there are likely many motivations - some they are aware of and some they are not aware of. My hope with this is not punishing people to stop the behaviour, but helping them have a wider view of their connection with themselves and then an expanded connection with what is outside them.
How does this fit in when they declared a state of emergency (cough cough) to nullify the above rights and good practice regulations, stipulated by law under normal circumstances? (E.g. the US)
How about you should not be talking about consent for known toxic materials going into one's body. It is wrong. The possibilities go to mass murder or genocide. There is a serious intent to do harm to a large population. The method is through a bioweapon.
Plasmids, like spike protein concerns are a distraction.
The PLATFORM is toxic already. The lipids cause most of the issues.
https://amothersanthem.substack.com/p/kariko-and-wiseman-study-2015-they
only because with the mRNA are the stuff that causes transfections inside of cells.
other things can get it inside the cells too.... adenovirus for example.
-----------------------
the problem in both cases is the immune system's response to "non-self" stuff that it finds.
they are ALL toxic. it is just a question of which ones are more lethal.
Do not comply with your executioners.
I think one good look at what the WHO is currently steamrollering through can confirm we are rapidly approaching the "We have ZERO Human Rights left at all" point.
Yet, the WHO is undeniably an unelected, private stakeholder corporation. They in no way represent the people of any nation. No matter what they say to the contrary.
So if someone can explain to me precisly *why* they wield the power they do unchallenged, or exactly why the people of each nation have not, with a very few exceptions, told them to go to hell already, I'd greatly appreciate it.
While I very much appreciate all the legal points made in this article, I would like to see another perspective being considered/discussed. While people may or may not be 'legally' correct, I always wonder what their motivation is for why they do what they do, and there are likely many motivations - some they are aware of and some they are not aware of. My hope with this is not punishing people to stop the behaviour, but helping them have a wider view of their connection with themselves and then an expanded connection with what is outside them.
How does this fit in when they declared a state of emergency (cough cough) to nullify the above rights and good practice regulations, stipulated by law under normal circumstances? (E.g. the US)
How about you should not be talking about consent for known toxic materials going into one's body. It is wrong. The possibilities go to mass murder or genocide. There is a serious intent to do harm to a large population. The method is through a bioweapon.