8 Comments
Feb 2Liked by World Council for Health

first..THANK YOU❤ second...people must still be sleeping. there should be 1000s of comments posted...

theyll have to awaken when it does knock on their front door!!!!!

keep in doing the good work you do!

love peace🇨🇦

Expand full comment
Feb 3Liked by World Council for Health

Bravo! Thank you so much for doing this.

As an English man living in germany, it's frightening to see what is happening.

I guess that many germans don't realise what could happen. I understand that Germany and the EU have invested a lot of money in this enterprise and may not listen to public concern.

Would a petition in Bundestag help?

Expand full comment

Christine Andersen might be able to - she’s fighting for Europe as an MEP - wonderful

woman

Expand full comment
Feb 5Liked by World Council for Health

We all have to say NO to this diabolical agenda. I do not consent! We do not consent!

It is important to state out loud or silently the statement : I do not consent.

It has to do with vibrations and Free Will. If you don't say anything, It can be considered as consent.

On the contrary, if a lof of people state I do not consent, it will create a kind of ripple effect in the energetic field which will spread and produce further effects, a kind of support to our cause and for protection.

Expand full comment

The CDU/CSU fraction has scheduled a debate for Thursday the 22.02.2024 at 16:50 as an opportunity to bash the providers of "misinformation" and spreaders of "conspiracy theories" with regards to the proposed pandemic treaty, Reference 20/9737. Pushing the "one health" agenda is central to their plans.

https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2024/kw08-de-who-pandemieabkommen-988624

The opposition party AfD has done the same, but there is no document reference available for their rebuttal.

Last year the AfD submitted a "small request" regarding the IHR (20/8613), to which a response was issued by the Federal Ministry of Health (20/7438 and 20/8853). Remarkably the response even acknowledges the binding nature of the IHR, and points out that member states have 10 months to reject the amendments. A very vague reference is made to German constitutional law.

All in all the global agenda is glorified in all aspects, including One Health. Individual concerns are quickly rolled over, and anyone who attempts to delve deeper into these points is branded as a conspiracy theorist and is spreading misinformation. Concerns about how "One Health" will impact the continued availability of many traditional medicinal treatments is nowhere to be seen in these documents.

I have generated an 11-page PDF translation of these documents into English, but have not found a way to attach it to this posting.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1st reading

Health

Applications for the WHO pandemic agreement

A person is holding a syringe and a bottle of a vaccine. In the background is the logo of the World Health Organization (WHO).

At the end of 2021, the WHO member states decided to develop an international pandemic agreement. (picture alliance / NurPhoto | Artur Widak)

Live broadcast: Thursday, February 22, 4:50 p.m.

The World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty will be the focus of a debate in the Bundestag on Thursday, 22 February 2024. Members of parliament have been presented with a motion by the CDU/CSU parliamentary group entitled "For transparent negotiations on the WHO pandemic treaty - against misinformation and conspiracy theories" (20/9737). The AfD parliamentary group has also announced a motion entitled "Rejection of the WHO pandemic treaty and the revised International Health Regulations (IHR)". Both motions are to be referred to the committees following the 40-minute debate. The Health Committee will take the lead in the further deliberations.

Motion by the CDU/CSU parliamentary group

The CDU/CSU parliamentary group is calling on the German government to consistently advocate the prevention approach, the comprehensive prevention of pandemics, in the negotiations on a World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic agreement. The WHO must become more capable of acting through the agreement, whereby its powers should be clearly defined and the central role of the member states and the rights of citizens should be safeguarded, the MEPs write in their motion. In addition, it must be ensured that the agreement is implemented in accordance with the national health policies of the member states and that national sovereignty rights remain fully intact.

Among other things, the German government is called upon to insist on close coordination between the Global Pandemic Convention and the International Health Regulations and to work consistently to anchor the so-called One Health approach, as only the interrelated consideration of human, animal and environmental health represents a sustainable and holistic concept of health. In addition, the negative effects of health-related misinformation and hate speech, especially in social media, should be actively combated and trust in public health systems andauthorities should be promoted. (ahe/hau/05.02.2024)

Expand full comment

.. the only people I know who changed their mind about health regulations suffer from post-vax and are too tired to be active .. we need an idea to shake of the arm chairs of the corruption ..

Expand full comment

thank you for posting Germany update:

pleased also to suggest:

how to market " W.H.0. dissent ? "

"W.H.0. Coup" ... (in ryhme)

scheduled completion

May 2024

dark siders attacking from all sides

focus on weakest piece

“bust up the W.H.0. "

brings freedom for you”

Defend the rule of law - Enforce Article 55

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC4Iyluleuw

Expand full comment