You mean they *assumed* there were no other sources of electronic devices.
MAC addresses don't appear out of nowhere, they come from an electronic device that provides integration with one of a number technical pieces. An address being exposed as a Bluetooth device implies a bluetooth antenna on a device somewhere. When the people were at…
You mean they *assumed* there were no other sources of electronic devices.
MAC addresses don't appear out of nowhere, they come from an electronic device that provides integration with one of a number technical pieces. An address being exposed as a Bluetooth device implies a bluetooth antenna on a device somewhere. When the people were at the graveyard had they driven there? Were their vehicles nearby? How many recording devices were they using? Did the graveyard have any high-tech headstones (https://www.funeralhelpcenter.com/cemetery-headstones-go-high-tech/)?
Did you know that with the Bluetooth 5.1 you can triangulate the location of antennae? Did any of the ghost/bluetooth hunters try doing that, or did they just stand around exclaiming that their phones showed something they didn't understand?
Again, all I've seen so far is people discovering that these Bluetooth antennae have been added to a huge number of every day devices, are detectable from a large distance, and are then jumping to idiotic conclusions.
You mean they *assumed* there were no other sources of electronic devices.
MAC addresses don't appear out of nowhere, they come from an electronic device that provides integration with one of a number technical pieces. An address being exposed as a Bluetooth device implies a bluetooth antenna on a device somewhere. When the people were at the graveyard had they driven there? Were their vehicles nearby? How many recording devices were they using? Did the graveyard have any high-tech headstones (https://www.funeralhelpcenter.com/cemetery-headstones-go-high-tech/)?
Did you know that with the Bluetooth 5.1 you can triangulate the location of antennae? Did any of the ghost/bluetooth hunters try doing that, or did they just stand around exclaiming that their phones showed something they didn't understand?
Again, all I've seen so far is people discovering that these Bluetooth antennae have been added to a huge number of every day devices, are detectable from a large distance, and are then jumping to idiotic conclusions.
Please watch the link that is documented in the article, and please make a comment referring to that work if you think it is suitable, thanks