39 Comments

And all of this, for a virus that poses no serious risk to 99.7% of people.

Wonderful.

Expand full comment
Apr 27, 2023Liked by World Council for Health

Saved and printed, for the record, both papers again. Also McCullough's paper from yesterday's Substack. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I have been following the research of Dr Ana Mihalcea. A finding of hers: 6 months ago, she was still seeing uncontaminated blood in unvaccinated people; now she is not finding any uncontaminated blood.

Expand full comment

I used to think that the vac was for immediate depop. Now I am thinking that the long goal is the youth and next generation. This could be why they are emphatic about getting thus injection into pregnant women and babies.... to change their DNA and thus create a whole new creature that will not be human from God's hand but a trans-human. The casualties of the vac are just conveniences because in the long term the goal is a new species created by man. Thoughts?

Expand full comment

Prior to the Swedish study, I had my suspicion that this novel gene therapy, conveniently labelled a "vaccine" does indeed contaminate the DNA of the recipient. Alarmingly, the Swedish study now proves it.

They mocked those who raised the issue, and claimed it did not alter DNA in any way. Another Lie. They knew.

It begs the question. If those who have taken even at least one injection, have "modified" DNA, are they theoretically G.M.?

If that is the case, then are those persons now patentable by the owners of the gene therapy?

I appreciate its a bit of a bizarre one, but the last few years has shown that nothing is as it seems.

Expand full comment

Advocating for more urgent testing? That’s all we need now. If this garbage is shed everywhere, then more control is coming. Next the antidote will be administered. Do we really need any more papers to stop the madness?

Expand full comment

People had to give informed consent to be vaccinated & sign docs as a record. Gvts, bureaucrats, Pharma & medics all insisted that those receiving the vaccines signed over their consent.

Those who for whichever reason chose not to be vaccinated did not give consent. As such, if it is proven that those who did not give consent are transfected by the mRNA due to shedding, there needs to be legal action against all those that demanded consent.

I developed lymphocytic colitis the week that my family was vaccinated - one AZ the other Pfizer. Covid was not wide spread in our community as we were still in lockdown. Plus I had a Covid antibody test showing that I did not have nor previously had Covid.

I did not give consent to be vaccinated nor impacted by shedding.

Expand full comment

It's good that you are reporting this to your audience.

Karen Kingston ("The Kingston Report" substack) first reported this on October 20, 2021 [yes, that early, 2021] in a live podcast by Brannon Howse. In her post of April 14, 2023, she quotes from a June 7, 2021 press release by AGC Biologics boasting that it is supplying to BioNTech the starting ingredients to make plasmid DNA. Its presence is "an essential component" of making the mRNA injectable product; intentional, not a contamination. Several other of her posts are equally revelatory.

Meanwhile, Ana Mihalcea MD PhD ("Dr Ana's Newsletter" substack) has been reporting on extensive harm being done to vaxxed and unvaxxed blood; also to meat and dairy. She has found that EDTA chelation removes the fibrous growths, toxic metals, and hydrogel, thus restoring the blood to normal. She adds nutritional support.

For whoever may be interested, I have collected what I consider the salient features of her work--she has many posts and podcast appearances--and posted them in my substack. Here is Part 1: https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/p/health-alarm-emf-activated-fibers. It presents startling evidence from dark field microscopy that she has reported having been recorded by a number of people. It also provides a preliminary discussion of how we may protect ourselves, which will be expanded in Part 2, building on my 50 years of using nutrition and other means to hold at bay the terribly disabling consequences of the panic-rushed, little-tested Swine Flu "vaccine" of 1976 in the U.S.

Expand full comment

I'm struggling to understand what "freshly unpasteurized" means.

Expand full comment

Thanks! As an unvaccinated person with cirs & leaky gut and many other issues, I had bleeding in menopause after helping injured elderly family 2 days after their second jab. Honestly I noticed a hindrance in my prayer life, it’s not flowing like it used to.

Expand full comment

Tess, I like you and your work, but this is more fear upon fear……focus on stopping all this madness, moratorium on all.

Expand full comment

Thank you. 🙏🙏

Expand full comment

've heard it hypothesised that this may be the pharmaceutical criminals instigating a commercial lien on the recipients. People become patentable. It's quite the assault on human dignity and sovereignty.

Expand full comment

Safe and effective, huh? Great work. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Tess, please see the work of Katherine Watt https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program. Your reaction/comments would be greatly appreciated.

Expand full comment

Or its found in the nose from nasal swab.

Reason when we have a flu aka detox and a running nose is that the body exerts toxins and encapsules them in mucus. We cant catch or spread disease to one and other. Its impossible and more so, never proven. Infact its been proven false.

Expand full comment