Thank you for this article. It is important to consider the confounding variable of non-native Electromagnetic Radiation, including Wireless Radiofrequency Radiation. This variable has increased markedly during the same data timeline as the rise of illness and death in multiple species (e.g., humans, birds, whales, bees, etc.). I share more on my Substack page, including health photos: https://reclaimedwellness.substack.com/
Non-native Electromagnetic Radiation offers a possible synergistic effect as our bodies accumulate more metals and pollutants, similar to a human version of a metal spoon in the microwave.
It would be of value to measure the surrounding levels of non-native Electromagnetic Radiation, including Wireless Radiofrequency Radiation, when there is a sudden collapse, seizure, cardiac event, or atypical outbreak of illness.
This data could help disentangle confounding variables and assess the relative strengths of any synergistic effects.
We are missing a significant piece of the puzzle without considering non-native Electromagnetic Radiation as a confounding variable for our current societal challenges. It is important for journalists, scientists, doctors, public officials, and citizens to consider this variable as we move into the next chapter of history.
Since the term vaccinated is vague (14 days after the jab one is still considered unvaxxed) , and mainly the elderly are keen to jab themselves (they are most likely to pass away) would a comparison between 20 to 65 years old vaxxd n unvaxxed not be a more conclusive indication the mRna jabs are the main cause of the excess deaths? Erik the Netherlands
I love 🌎 World Council For Health! 🫂 xx oo. Thank you for all that you're doing. God Bless.
Thank you for this article. It is important to consider the confounding variable of non-native Electromagnetic Radiation, including Wireless Radiofrequency Radiation. This variable has increased markedly during the same data timeline as the rise of illness and death in multiple species (e.g., humans, birds, whales, bees, etc.). I share more on my Substack page, including health photos: https://reclaimedwellness.substack.com/
Non-native Electromagnetic Radiation offers a possible synergistic effect as our bodies accumulate more metals and pollutants, similar to a human version of a metal spoon in the microwave.
It would be of value to measure the surrounding levels of non-native Electromagnetic Radiation, including Wireless Radiofrequency Radiation, when there is a sudden collapse, seizure, cardiac event, or atypical outbreak of illness.
This data could help disentangle confounding variables and assess the relative strengths of any synergistic effects.
We are missing a significant piece of the puzzle without considering non-native Electromagnetic Radiation as a confounding variable for our current societal challenges. It is important for journalists, scientists, doctors, public officials, and citizens to consider this variable as we move into the next chapter of history.
The Environmental Health Trust has a wealth of resources on their website, including links to published science and infographics to reduce our exposures to Wireless Radiation: https://healthytechhome.org/published-science-on-wireless-radiation-and-childrens-health/
Since the term vaccinated is vague (14 days after the jab one is still considered unvaxxed) , and mainly the elderly are keen to jab themselves (they are most likely to pass away) would a comparison between 20 to 65 years old vaxxd n unvaxxed not be a more conclusive indication the mRna jabs are the main cause of the excess deaths? Erik the Netherlands