SafeBlood enables the matching of blood donors who have not received mRNA ‘vaccinations’ with people needing blood transfusions but not wanting to be exposed to vaccinated blood.
No blood transfusions period for me, on my advanced directives! Be your own best advocate every second with every person when in health care setting. Had a procedure and everyone reassured me no antibiotics or steroids until I got to the anesthesiologist and I nipped that in the bud! No big pharma for me!! There is a natural treatment for every pharm!! They don’t want you to know!! Stay on your toes and get your advanced directives in order and make sure you have someone to speak for you! I have it on my phone as a Lock Screen and a tag that says Do NOT treat without reading my advance directives! You can not speak that is consent to treat! Learned that in CPR and first aide I have had for 40+ years and 30 yrs in health care! These people are the worst criminals!!
I acknowledge the shedding can happen but to what degree? I think Dr Mihalcea's claim is rather over generalised and sensationalised. (Maybe only applicable in her client group???)
Also the embalmers are not saying the unjabbed corpses show the same level of clotting as the jabbed corpses. That is another indicator to look for.
Can be designed to act as a vector. Some researchers talk about IgG4 and antibody class switch amongst the repeatedly jabbed persons. If the same toxic stuff found in the jabs gets transferred via shedding (at the exosome level?), it can equally undermine the unjabbed person's immune system.
But I don't know how dense and how invasive. I also note the reported symptoms seem to vary ranging from severe forms like bleeding, rash and nausea to none. (Probably to some extent, psychological? Makes it worse in any case) I personally consider, it's a form of poisoning and if you are not the actual toxin factory and have a well nurtured immune system and keep detoxing on a regular basis, you will be less affected.
I guess that's why they wanted to inject the stuff into the bodies, rather than just spraying it over people. No?
Dr Mihalcea’s research was not properly controlled. And she makes BROAD claims on her “data” that is truly frightening.
From Dr Jane Ruby: Please don't get sucked into some of these PhD's with no medical training, who are telling you that the un-jabbed are showing changes in their red blood cells and stacking. Here's how I know they are questionable:
Many other factors can cause Rouleaux, the medical term for stacking of red blood cells that have lost their negative ion charge. This can happen if you're dehydrated, if you have diabetes or if you have a particularly high amount of blood sugar circulating at the moment. This is one of the many reasons I don't trust Ana Mihalcea's work
Again figure it out for yourself, look it up and report back to me with the number of potential factors or causes of Rouleaux.
PS one of the first things that turned me off to her was when she started appearing on Stu show and postulating with the white Embalmer clots were made of when she had never done an analysis, and never had a courtesy of contacting me to discuss the evidence that I have from numerous embalmers.
Some other researchers support that hypothesis, Although it's a rather guessing game at this point in time, since the content of the injections seems to differ from batch to batch.
It's just that Mike Adams's chemical analysis indicates very little organic materials. More metal synthetic nature.
Look at Dr Mc Millan subatscks they can’t find clean control blood. Amyloid etc.
Also they are doing a study on hamsters injecting them for a detox protocol as well as the coagulation cascade and most of all the neurological symptoms that they developing.
I was literally thinking the same thing, so the UNVAXXED need their blood screened for it first prior to transfusion! However at least there is a group out there willing to do this, it’s awesome! Wonder if they’re in Canada, should be on their link :)
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I would never have given this a thought, the way I am, a transfusion with vax contaminated blood would probably finish me off!!
Dr. Anna says the hydrogel is the problem and also the graphene. I'm so confused and freaked out. She said it's in dental anesthetics too. But hydrogel is also a stabilizer, delivery system and thickener and has been in everything for years. I'm trying to find out exactly why it's so dangerous and don't get answers, except that it's in all of our blood. Graphene.. No I don't want metals in injectables but no one tells us what is the purpose of them from a scientific, pharmaceutical side. Maybe there's a good reason. Maybe they're not so toxic as nano or particles? I wish there were more science people speaking about all of this. People are saying they'll never go to the dentist or the hospital and so many are terrified, as I am.
No blood transfusions period for me, on my advanced directives! Be your own best advocate every second with every person when in health care setting. Had a procedure and everyone reassured me no antibiotics or steroids until I got to the anesthesiologist and I nipped that in the bud! No big pharma for me!! There is a natural treatment for every pharm!! They don’t want you to know!! Stay on your toes and get your advanced directives in order and make sure you have someone to speak for you! I have it on my phone as a Lock Screen and a tag that says Do NOT treat without reading my advance directives! You can not speak that is consent to treat! Learned that in CPR and first aide I have had for 40+ years and 30 yrs in health care! These people are the worst criminals!!
What say you to claims by Dr Anna Mihalcea who purports to see through her research that the shedding aspect has infiltrated everyone?
I acknowledge the shedding can happen but to what degree? I think Dr Mihalcea's claim is rather over generalised and sensationalised. (Maybe only applicable in her client group???)
Also the embalmers are not saying the unjabbed corpses show the same level of clotting as the jabbed corpses. That is another indicator to look for.
Is there something about shedding as a vector that precludes the normal operation of a well-nurtured immune system?
Can be designed to act as a vector. Some researchers talk about IgG4 and antibody class switch amongst the repeatedly jabbed persons. If the same toxic stuff found in the jabs gets transferred via shedding (at the exosome level?), it can equally undermine the unjabbed person's immune system.
But I don't know how dense and how invasive. I also note the reported symptoms seem to vary ranging from severe forms like bleeding, rash and nausea to none. (Probably to some extent, psychological? Makes it worse in any case) I personally consider, it's a form of poisoning and if you are not the actual toxin factory and have a well nurtured immune system and keep detoxing on a regular basis, you will be less affected.
I guess that's why they wanted to inject the stuff into the bodies, rather than just spraying it over people. No?
What "(can) be designed to act as a vector?"
The shots (if they know how to do it.)
45 or 9mm?
Dr Mihalcea’s research was not properly controlled. And she makes BROAD claims on her “data” that is truly frightening.
From Dr Jane Ruby: Please don't get sucked into some of these PhD's with no medical training, who are telling you that the un-jabbed are showing changes in their red blood cells and stacking. Here's how I know they are questionable:
Many other factors can cause Rouleaux, the medical term for stacking of red blood cells that have lost their negative ion charge. This can happen if you're dehydrated, if you have diabetes or if you have a particularly high amount of blood sugar circulating at the moment. This is one of the many reasons I don't trust Ana Mihalcea's work
Again figure it out for yourself, look it up and report back to me with the number of potential factors or causes of Rouleaux.
PS one of the first things that turned me off to her was when she started appearing on Stu show and postulating with the white Embalmer clots were made of when she had never done an analysis, and never had a courtesy of contacting me to discuss the evidence that I have from numerous embalmers.
Although I think she may be right about the DARPA's hydrogel theory.
that, I don't know much about. Just one more thing to research, ugh!
Some other researchers support that hypothesis, Although it's a rather guessing game at this point in time, since the content of the injections seems to differ from batch to batch.
It's just that Mike Adams's chemical analysis indicates very little organic materials. More metal synthetic nature.
How about medical PhDs with no nutritional training, as medical doctors are?
Look at Dr Mc Millan subatscks they can’t find clean control blood. Amyloid etc.
Also they are doing a study on hamsters injecting them for a detox protocol as well as the coagulation cascade and most of all the neurological symptoms that they developing.
I was literally thinking the same thing, so the UNVAXXED need their blood screened for it first prior to transfusion! However at least there is a group out there willing to do this, it’s awesome! Wonder if they’re in Canada, should be on their link :)
SafeBlood doesn't appear to be that group.
It isn't made clear on the SafeBlood website that the One Time Membership is a lifetime membership.
There doesn't seem to be a mechanism that would force medical providers to secure only unvaccinated blood in the SafeBlood plan.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I would never have given this a thought, the way I am, a transfusion with vax contaminated blood would probably finish me off!!
Dr. Anna says the hydrogel is the problem and also the graphene. I'm so confused and freaked out. She said it's in dental anesthetics too. But hydrogel is also a stabilizer, delivery system and thickener and has been in everything for years. I'm trying to find out exactly why it's so dangerous and don't get answers, except that it's in all of our blood. Graphene.. No I don't want metals in injectables but no one tells us what is the purpose of them from a scientific, pharmaceutical side. Maybe there's a good reason. Maybe they're not so toxic as nano or particles? I wish there were more science people speaking about all of this. People are saying they'll never go to the dentist or the hospital and so many are terrified, as I am.
What was the point of this article, how can we access unvaccinated blood in Britain???
The article says that there are branches in 53 countries. I'm sure the UK would have a branch.