Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Science Analyst's avatar

Yes. Non-ionizing electromagnetic waves can cause damage. You always need some antenna like system and a resonator to get force/energy transfer to the system. Some biological structures can do that. Here is explained how non-ionizing EM-waves affect biological systems. https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/how-non-ionizing-radiation-affects

Don't get confused about the word Graphene. Graphene is a strip of graphite (pure carbon). It is a neutral substance. But toxicity research should indeed be done, especially if stuff is added to it.

Due to the many different ways it is used and due to futurism (science fiction), a lot of people think that the substance graphene is something magical that can do all sorts of technical stuff at the same time. Don't get confused. It is like silicon. Silicon is used to fabricate chips in very big and precise machinery. And it is in sand grinding the gears or in silicon oil that lubricates the gears.

The graphene-oxide that is in the patents about vaccines, are using graphene like a very small rope. A rope on which they can stick all kinds of stuff, like mRNA. So it is clearly not used as some antenna or technical component. The liquid substance is grey due to the carbon fibers (=graphene). And Covid-vax is transparant and fluorescent with ultra-violet. So the covid-vax does not contain the graphene or graphene-oxide. It is very toxic in other ways.

> Is it possible that graphene is magnified by the EMF emitted by mobile phone antennas

Graphene is not related to mobile phones or EMF. Unless you make some antenna-like system. For that you need to make an antenna system, and an amplifier. But the graphene usually folds itself and is of different sizes, making it useless as some antenna. It may replace the aluminum components on silicon chips one day, but it is currently very hard to work with.

I designed some micro-chips myself and have technical knowledge of antennas. If there are any questions, I will try answering them. There are not many technical people who understand that microwaves can be harmful. Most "experts" are very biased towards ignoring all such dangers.

Ernest D. Lieberman's avatar

Wonderful! Very informative! Citing over 20 sources finding graphene compounds in C19 injectables.

Yet why does this post end with "Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are Francesca’s own and do not necessarily represent the World Council for Health."

The disclaimer goes to Karen Kingston's post "Why Opponents to Medical Freedom Don't Want You to Talk About this $Multi-Trillion Industry." https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/why-opponents-to-medical-freedom

I note too that Tess Lawrie put her name to the findings of an independent lab that graphene compounds were found in C19 injections.

https://pa.childrenshealthdefense.org/uncategorized/uk-scientist-confirms-contamination-in-all-major-vaccines/

https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/covid-19-vaccines-contents-prelim-summary-rob-verkerk/

Penny Butler reported that the updated comprehensive report, dated April 20, 2022, confirmed graphene oxide in the injections. https://pennybutler.com/uk-lab-vial-contents/

I am writing an "Open Letter to Health Freedom Advocates" arguing that showing extensive damage to blood can be a way to build widespread public support for banning both the LNP mRNA platform and the use of graphene compounds in all injectable products (for starters).

Thank you for this post. I will be citing it. Good Health to You!

54 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?