The Comirnaty Data Dump: The Safety Data Sheet They Never Wanted You To See
A document buried by Pfizer/BioNTech reveals a staggering breach of occupational and public safety protocols. A substance classified as high-risk for handlers was presented as a benign vial of hope.
You’re a healthcare worker in late 2020. You’re handed a vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty. You’re told it’s a miracle of modern science. You are not told it is internally classified with the same level of occupational hazard as some potent chemotherapeutic drugs.
You draw it up in a syringe without an airtight suit. You dispose of the vial in a regular sharps bin. You were never given the one document that, by law, was supposed to guide your safety: the Material Safety Data Sheet (SDS).
That document has now surfaced. And it tells a story of systemic failure so profound it threatens to shatter what little trust remains in our health authorities.
The Smoking Gun: OEB-5 and the Chasm Between Rule and Reality
Let’s cut to the chase. The most explosive revelation isn’t on the public-facing SDS; it’s in Pfizer’s internal occupational exposure banding. The active ingredient, the mRNA construct known as BNT162b2 (or PF-07302048), was classified as Occupational Exposure Band 5 (OEB-5) (Pfizer, 2021, as cited in Stebel, 2024).
What does OEB-5 mean? It signifies a substance with “high toxic potential.” For context, OEB-5 requires exposure control to less than 1 microgram per cubic meter of air. This is the highest band before “extremely high toxic potential” (OEB-6) (Containment Technology, n.d.).
The internal SDS for the final product, Comirnaty, outlines the rigorous handling procedures this classification demands (Pfizer, 2022):
Containment: Use of closed-system procedures.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Impervious disposable protective clothing, double gloves, safety goggles, and crucially, a respirator with a particulate filter (e.g. P3 filter) to prevent aerosol inhalation.
Disposal: Contaminated materials must be incinerated as special waste to prevent environmental release.
Now, cast your mind back to the images of vaccination centers. Nurses in scrubs. Doctors in lab coats. No full-face respirators. No hazmat suits. The vials, syringes, and gloves were tossed into standard medical waste, destined for conventional incineration at temperatures far below the recommended 1200°C required for high-risk biologics.
The rulebook was thrown out, and no one told the players.
The Great Misdirection: “Not Classified as Dangerous”
“But wait,” I hear the skeptical reader say. “The public SDS explicitly states the product is ‘not classified as dangerous’ according to GHS (Globally Harmonized System) standards!”
You are correct. And this is where the legal and ethical sleight of hand becomes a masterclass in obfuscation. The SDS states (Pfizer, 2022, Section 2):
GHS Classification: Not classified.
But then, buried in Section 11, the truth emerges:
General Information: Toxicological properties have not been thoroughly investigated.
The loophole is as wide as it is cynical. They didn’t classify it as dangerous because they claim they didn’t have enough data to do so. This is not the same as declaring it safe. It’s a regulatory grey zone exploited to avoid slapping a skull-and-crossbones on a vial destined for billions of arms. Meanwhile, for their own employees in the production facility, the OEB-5 classification dictated extreme caution (Pfizer, 2021, as cited in Stebel, 2024).
The Chain of Responsibility: Who Knew, and When?
This wasn’t an oversight. It was a policy. The responsibility for providing a Safety Data Sheet lies squarely with the supplier—in this case, BioNTech/Pfizer. The law is clear: it must be provided “free of charge, on paper or electronically, no later than upon the first delivery,” and simply posting it online is insufficient (Arbeitsschutz in NRW, n.d.).
Evidence obtained through a freedom of information request (FragDenStaat) shows the German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) was actively corresponding with BioNTech about updated safety data sheets as early as December 2021 (BMG, 2021). The links in these emails are redacted, as if the very location of the document is a state secret.
Furthermore, a legal analysis by Hedley Rees (2024) points out that by having healthcare professionals dilute the vaccine, they were effectively acting as the “final manufacturer.” This made every doctor’s office and vaccination center a point of production, legally obligating them to adhere to the SDS’s safety protocols—protocols they never received.
The list of those potentially exposed without proper protection is long and damning:
Doctors and Nurses
Medical Assistants
Cleaning Staff in clinics and vaccination centers
Waste Management Workers
This Isn’t About Vaccine Efficacy. It’s About Informed Consent for Everyone.
Let’s be perfectly clear. This is not a debate about the vaccine’s medical benefits or risks for patients. That is a separate, though deeply related, issue.
This is about the fundamental right of every worker to know the risks they are facing on the job. It is about the legal and ethical duty of care that governments and corporations owe to their citizens and employees.
The SDS scandal reveals a two-tiered system of safety: one for the pharmaceutical insiders who handle the product with extreme caution, and another for the frontline healthcare workers and the public, who were kept in the dark.
What Now? The Four Demands
This cannot be swept under the rug. We need:
A Full Independent Inquiry: Occupational safety authorities must investigate why these protocols were ignored at a national and global level.
Transparency for All Workers: Every person who handled these vials must be informed of the potential risks they were exposed to without their knowledge.
Legal Accountability: There must be a judicial review to determine liability for this breach of occupational safety laws.
An Immediate Policy Overhaul: The disposal and handling protocols for all such products must be audited and corrected.
The Comirnaty Safety Data Sheet is more than a document; it’s a testament to a system that chose expediency over transparency, and public relations over public safety. It’s a story that deserves to be read, shared, and acted upon.
They knew. And they did nothing. Now, we have the proof.
World Council for Health stands for a better way.
📎 Resources & Further Reading
Download the Analysis: Dr. Sabine Stebel’s full breakdown of the Safety Data Sheet.
View the Documents: The key documents, including the internal Pfizer OEB classification and the BMG-BioNTech correspondence, are linked within the analysis.
References
Arbeitsschutz in NRW. (n.d.) Sicherheitsdatenblatt. Retrieved from https://www.arbeitsschutz.nrw.de/suche?volltext=Sicherheitsdatenblatt
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). (2021). Briefverkehr mit BioNtech. [FragDenStaat archive]. Retrieved from https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/briefverkehr-mit-biontech/
Containment Technology. (n.d.) OEB Stufen. Retrieved from https://www.containment-technology.com/oeb-stufen/
Pfizer. (2022, May 13). *Sicherheitsdatenblatt: Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine Tris-Sucrose* (Version 2.01).
Rees, H. (2024, July 25). DO-IT-YOURSELF FROZEN JABS BROKE PHARMACEUTICAL LAW. INSIDE PHARMA. Retrieved from https://hedleyrees.substack.com/p/do-it-yourself-frozen-jabs-broke
Stebel, S. (2024). *Die Bundesregierung setzt heimlich Gesetze und Verordnungen für Covid-19-Impfstoffe außer Kraft. DrBine’s Newsletter*. Retrieved from https://drbine.substack.com/p/die-bundesregierung-setzt-heimlich
Keep up the good work 👏