Disease X: The Next Step to a Global Government?

The lessons learned from the Covid-19 crisis suggest that the World Health Organisation should not have the authority to dictate or mandate control over future pandemics.

By Christof Plothe, DO, Steering Committee Member of the World Council for Health

"Disease X" has become a buzzword in the media landscape, a hypothetical construct conceived by a committee of virologists and disease analysts under the World Health Organization (WHO) between 2017 and 2018. This concept was first unveiled in 2017 and subsequently explored in the Clade X Simulation (2018) and in Event 201, a pandemic simulation (2019), both initiatives backed by the Gates Foundation. 

In a foreboding announcement at the Munich Security Conference in 2022, Bill Gates predicted that there would be yet another inevitable pandemic. Echoing this sentiment, WHO Director-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, issued a stern warning to non-compliant nations about the impending emergence of "Disease X". He championed a "New World Order" through a United Nations (UN) "Pandemic Treaty," proposing a centralized power structure under an unelected world government comprising the WHO and the World Economic Forum (WEF).

In theory, “Disease X” serves as a hypothetical menace, a catalyst to spur the development of countermeasures against future outbreaks. Despite the supposedly hypothetical nature, in 2022, the WHO assembled over 300 scientists to investigate, concluding it was potentially capable of causing an epidemic 20 times more lethal than Covid-19. Given the suspected biolab origin of Covid-19, this raises unsettling questions about the potential deliberate release of such pathogens. 

Tedros Ghebreyesus, the WHO's leader, has faced criticism for undemocratic actions such as declaring a multi-country monkeypox outbreak a public health emergency against the advice of its advisory council. 

Vaccine production for “Disease X” is already underway at the UK Ministry of Defence Science and Technology Porter Down Campus. This cutting-edge vaccine aims to fortify immunity against the hypothetical “Disease X” and is projected to be developed within 100 days of identifying the new threat. Regrettably, the Biological Weapons Convention does not prohibit biological weapons due to a loophole permitting their development for peaceful purposes. It also overlooks gain of function research, which urgently requires global prohibition. 

The partnership between the World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization, evident at Davos meetings, has sparked concerns. A paper published in the International Journal of Arts of Social Science titled "The World Economic Form, The Lancet, and COVID-19 Knowledge Gatekeeping" exposes the WEF's influence on knowledge institutions, including the suppression of alternative hypotheses like the lab leak narrative.

Under the leadership of Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on January 30th, 2020, despite a lack of scientific basis. The WHO now implores all member states to sign the proposed pandemic treaty to safeguard against “Disease X”.

In the U.S., H.R. 3832 was introduced to the House of Representatives on June 5, 2023, to develop medical countermeasures for potential pandemics. This follows the establishment of BARDA during the Covid-19 pandemic, which awarded contracts to over 100 companies for Covid-related products, including Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines. In January 2023, BARDA began funding Moderna's development of new mRNA vaccines against the Ebola, Sudan, Marburg, and Lassa viruses. Denver Health healthcare workers are now being vaccinated with Merck's live Ebola vaccine 'ERVEBO' in preparation for a potential future outbreak. Johns Hopkins researchers, heavily funded by the same Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, have confirmed that Maryland's health department staff received Ebola-specific training. A $12 million bat lab, potentially to study Ebola, is under construction in Fort Collins, Colorado. The journal Nature reports that gain-of-function research, linked to the Covid outbreak, is being conducted on Ebola viruses. Meanwhile, researchers in Zambia and Japan are developing a rapid Ebola detection kit.

To summarise, the WHO, an unelected and undemocratic organisation heavily funded by industrial investors, has created the spectre of a new disease and new pandemic. In a perfect chain of action, reaction, and solution, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the University of Oxford have pledged a significant $80 million to the development of a vaccine, with bird flu being a potential target. Both entities are funded by the same private partnerships as above, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Meanwhile, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been proactive in conducting trials for avian influenza vaccines. Echoing the urgency of the situation, Dr Robert Redfield, former Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), anticipates a severe bird flu pandemic and underscores the importance of preparedness. Adding to the complexity of the situation, Dr Richard Bartlett warns of the potential weaponization of bird flu in labs, with additional vaccines already in the pipeline. 

High-profile health experts, including Dr Robert Redfield, have issued stark warnings about the potential severity of a bird flu pandemic, suggesting it could surpass the devastation wrought by Covid-19. Dr Richard Bartlett, a former adviser to Texas Governor Rick Perry, has raised concerns about the potential for vaccine manufacturers to exploit future pandemics for profit and the possibility of bird flu being weaponized in a laboratory setting. 

The Covid-19 pandemic has cast a critical light on the WHO's approach to managing health crises. Critics have pointed to issues such as censorship, over-reliance on vaccines, unscientific testing methods, suppression of alternative treatments, and coercion for vaccination. The pandemic has also led to a significant wealth transfer, with billionaires increasing their share of global wealth from 2% to 3.5%. A third of American small businesses closed, global poverty increased by 11.6%, and 150 million people faced food shortages. 

Despite these hypothetical challenges, other continuing health crises persist, including tuberculosis, malaria, antimicrobial resistance, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, respiratory diseases, Alzheimer's, infectious diseases, diabetes, kidney and liver diseases, traumatic injuries, and suicide. These issues, which are among the top causes of death worldwide, have remained unsolved and perhaps require the WHO's attention. 

The WHO, WEF, and Gates Foundation's fabrication of the hypothetical “Disease X” has been criticized for instilling fear and using it as a tool for compliance. A 2021 study found that fear was the only predictor of behavior change during Covid-19, despite its negative impact on emotional and physical wellbeing. The use of AI for global governance, aiming to digitize the world's population, is another concern. 

Solutions include stopping the pandemic treaty, exiting the WHO, prohibiting gain of function research, and reestablishing health regulatory bodies free from industry influence.

The spectre of one world health diktats and centralised power in the hands of unelected organisations like WHO or WEF, with strings being pulled behind the scenes by billionaire businessmen is looming larger by the day. “Disease X “carries forward the gains in International compliance through undemocratic one-world government tools like the Pandemic Treaty, which intends to make pariahs of non-compliant states.

The staging of a novel coronavirus pandemic was highlighted in Event 201, but as early as 2017, a coronavirus pandemic simulation called the SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 scenario was held. In 2018, “Disease X” was added to a list of global threats, which included familiar diseases like Ebola, Zika, and SARS. 

Due to the strong likelihood of the biolab provenance of several pathogens, including Covid-19, why, then, is the internationally-ratified Biological Weapons Convention not fit for purpose when it comes to gain-of-function research? It is of paramount importance that this be banned worldwide forthwith.

The WEF and WHO partnership, evident at the recent Davos meeting where “Disease X” was a main topic, has been criticized for its until recently invisible influence on scientific journals, scientists, universities, and media. The WEF has penetrated all knowledge institutions that therefore promote the natural Covid-19 virus origins hypothesis and silences contrarian hypotheses.

To conclude, the lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic suggest that the World Health Organisation should not have the authority to dictate or mandate control over future health crises. Concerns have been raised about censorship, an over-reliance on vaccines as the sole solution, unscientific testing methods, suppression of certain drugs, coercion for vaccination, and the rapid development of vaccines. The pandemic has also led to a redefinition of vaccines and the introduction of gene therapy and further paved the way towards Global Governance with the use of AI to digitize the world's eight billion people into a global data bank, essentially paving the way for a one-world government. 

The WEF and the WHO perceive the One Health model and the pandemic agreement as vehicles to increase global control, with “Disease X” being their next instrument. The WHO, without consulting sovereign nations, has prioritized their ideology over human rights, necessitating the rejection of the One Health model and withdrawal from the WHO. 

There is a better way. 

---

If you find value in this Substack and have the means, please consider making a contribution to support the World Council for Health. Thank you.